Turbulence (or seeing) is a great concern when recording images of the sky, because this is jeopardizing astronomical telescope resolution. Record images during best seeing is really a big advantage, to do so, continuous seeing measurement is required to optimize image recording time. To get seeing measurements, the DIMM method is mostly used by professionnal observatories in order to measure atmospheric seeing (or turbulence) and allowing to optimize targets and observation programs.
Nevertheless, DIMM method requires a telescope with enough focal length (>3000mm) and enough aperture (>250mm), and to track bright stars the whole night. This is quite stringent and can be a quite costly approach. The telescope needs a shelter, and automatically jump from a star to another.

ALCOR-SYSTEM provides a method to overcome some of the drawbacks of the DIMM system.

In the northern hemisphere, a bright star called "polaris" that does not move so much in the sky and is bright enough.

The fixed seeing monitor uses the Polaris star, and ALCOR-SYSTEM is proud to present this new product : CYCLOPE
© ALCOR SYSTEM
The goal of this product is to measure atmospheric seeing condition in a continuous fashion, so this setup stays outdoor all the time 24h a day, and is aimed at the polaris star in a fixed fashion.

This system can only work in the northern hemisphere, at latitudes above 15° North, for southern hemisphere please contact us for solutions.

The fixed seeing monitor is a totally sealed system that can overcome all extreme weather conditions, and is not sensitive to wind gust due to its strong design. The software starts measurements automatically when the Sun is below the horizon and only when the stars are visible.

The system has four temperature sensors and two humidity sensors so that warming up of the entrance window is automatic (to prevent dew from forming), and also controls the cooling of the seeing detector.

The added value of this product compared to competitors are :

- better measurement accuracy because of more and smaller pixels
- the front window is heated against dew
- ethernet link to the host
- ability to measure very low seeing figure, whereas other systems are not reliable under 1.5 arcsec.
- strong and robust construction, that avoid measurements to be jeopardized by wind gust
Customer installations
This system offers watertight connectors, for continuous outdoor operation.
The line of sight can be adjusted accurately to aim at polaris star. Once this is performed, there is no need to carry out any further adjustements. The system is made of high quality alloy colorless anodized aluminum.
Operating software
The software is embedded to this system. We have Windows software, for Linux, please ask us.
The field of view of the system is 3.6° x 2.5° and perfectly accomodates the polaris star path throughout the whole night / whole year, so that continuous measurements can be performed.
View of the running software
Validation tests
Since the image recording is performed continuously, it can provide a figure of seeing expressed in arcsec (or Fried's Ro) in a continuous matter, if weather conditions allows.

The next plot shows seeing measurement over the course of a night. The data is coming from this product (vertical axis is seeing, horizontal axis is time) :
It is very interesting to note that, over a night, large variation of zenith seeing can occur (from 1.2 to 2.3 arcsec in this case)
In order to prove that this concept is working in a reliable fashion, it has been compared with other systems, at the same time and the same place.
Observatoire de Paris / Syrte
Putnam Mountain Observatory (USA, Texas)
Real time of this place measurements can be followed up here, if weather allows
One of our system has been installed at ST VERAN Observatory in France. This place is located at 3000 m (10,000ft) of elevation, in the French Alps. The Cyclope substains very harsh conditions in a very successfull manner. This is a good place to validate our robust design. All data and images are courtesy from Département Systèmes de Référence Temps-Espace / credits : Observatoire de Paris / Syrte F.Taris
Comparison with DIMM
Another test consisted in using a Ritchey Chretien 250 mm F8 telescope, with a standard scientific sony ccd camera, and a pixel scale of 0.35 arcsec per pixel. The exposure time was 5 sec, and unsaturated star FWHM was measured on both star axis. The selected star was always close to zenith.

The red dots are the star FWHM over the time from the RC telescope. The black dots are from the cyclop apparatus, and shows very good agreement with the telescope measurements.
Comparison with an imaging telescope
To check out the validity of the data that comes out from this apparatus, this system has been compared with another seeing system called DIMM, used in most professionnal observatories. Systems were located few meters appart.
Here are the results, the blue line is from the DIMM and the red line from the fixed seeing monitor.The agreement between these two plots is very good, so the data coming out from the fixed seeing monitor can be regarded as reliable.
The next link will show all real time measurements, such as :
In all tests we did, the cyclope results could never be defeated or compromized by any other measurements.
The system has been running flawlessly since Sept 2015.
Some data of a night shows seeing figures lower than 1 arcsec, and even lower, reaching almost 0.5 arcsec !
A Cyclope was installed in the south est of the USA, running 24h a day. All data and images are courtesy from Ken Kattner and Putnam Moutain Observatory.
Real time of this place measurements can be followed up here, if weather allows
- zenith seeing plot
- star size plot  (FWHM)
- Mean flux plot (for could monitoring)
- Star Motion data
- All temperature an humidity sensors from the system
PLEASE ASK US FOR A QUOTE
Windows 7,8 and 10 software is available here
A last comparison with 10" DIMM system, carried out in July 2016. This is very close, and some difference is visible because polaris star and a star in cygnus constellation has been used, so the optical atmospheric path is not exactly the same.